Receiving Earning Prostitute Maryland Laws 11-304 Anne Arundel

Receiving Earning Of A Prostitute Defense – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Receiving Earning Of A Prostitute in Maryland.

If you have been charged with Receiving Earning Of A Prostitute, contact our firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Baltimore & Montgomery (Rockville).

Receiving Earning Of A Prostitute Defense In Maryland

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Receiving Earning Prostitute Maryland Laws 11-304 Anne Arundel
Receiving Earning Prostitute Maryland Laws 11-304 Anne Arundel

MARYLAND LAWYERS – RECEIVING EARNINGS OF PROSTITUTE – STATUTE:

Md. CRIMINAL LAW Code Ann. § 11-304

Receiving earnings of prostitute

(a) Prohibited. — A person may not receive or acquire money or proceeds from the earnings of a person engaged in prostitution with the intent to:

(1) promote a crime under this subtitle;

(2) profit from a crime under this subtitle; or

(3) conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of money or proceeds of a crime under this subtitle.

(b) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or a fine not exceeding $ 10,000 or both.

(c) Statute of limitations and in banc review. — A person who violates this section is subject to § 5-106(b) of the Courts Article.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Maryland Child Abuse Lawyer Anne Arundel

Child Abuse – Maryland Lawyers

If you need to defend a Child Abuse Charge and you are concerned about a conviction, contact our law firm immediately for help and to speak to a Maryland Lawyer.

We have client meeting locations in Baltimore & Montgomery (Rockville).

Maryland Child Abuse Lawyer.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Jackson v. State

Facts:

Defendant appealed from his conviction in the Circuit Court for Baltimore (Maryland) for child abuse and a third-degree sexual offense. Defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence; the admission of testimony from his victim, wife, and mother; and the trial court’s use of impermissible sentencing considerations. Defendant also argued that double jeopardy prevented his separate conviction and sentence for both charged offenses.

If you are facing a criminal case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Maryland Child Abuse Lawyer Anne Arundel
Maryland Child Abuse Lawyer Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • Child abuse may consist of either: (i) the sustaining of physical injury by a child as a result of cruel or inhumane treatment or as a result of a malicious act by any parent or other person who has permanent or temporary care or custody or responsibility for supervision of a child under circumstances that indicate that the child’s health or welfare is harmed or threatened thereby; or (ii) sexual abuse of a child, whether physical injuries are sustained or not.
  • One of the recognized exceptions to the “other crimes” exclusionary rule is where the evidence shows a passion or propensity for illicit sexual relations with the particular person who is the victim of the charged offense.

We have client meeting locations in Baltimore & Montgomery (Rockville).

Maryland Child Abuse Lawyer.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Absolute Divorce Maryland Anne Arundel

Absolute Divorce – Maryland Lawyers

There are many factors to consider when filing for an Absolute Divorce In Maryland.

If you are dealing with an Absolute Divorce In Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore.

Absolute Divorce In Maryland

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Warner v. Warner

Facts:

The husband filed a complaint for limited divorce and the wife filed a counterclaim for absolute divorce, alimony, and other relief. The lower court granted a judgment of absolute divorce to the husband and reserved the authority to make a marital award after taking testimony and evidence on the property interest of the parties. After hearing further testimony, the lower court awarded the wife a $ 30,000 marital award and ordered the husband to pay court costs, but denied the wife’s request for alimony and counsel fees. In affirming, the court held that the husband was precluded from challenging the validity of the decree because he filed his notice of appeal over 19 months after the lower court entered the divorce decree and because the court did not have jurisdiction to consider an issue on appeal where the husband appealed from the lower court’s denial of a motion to alter or amend judgment, and that motion challenged only a completely collateral matter. The court further held that the lower court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the wife’s request for counsel fees.

If you are facing a divorce case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Absolute Divorce Maryland Anne Arundel
Absolute Divorce Maryland Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • A judgment for absolute divorce is clearly in the nature of “other relief” as contemplated by Md. R. Civ. P. 2-601. Thus, as conditions precedent to the entry of judgment for absolute divorce, the court must (1) direct the clerk to enter judgment, and (2) the clerk must enter judgment on the docket..
  • If a ruling of the court is to constitute a final judgment, it must have at least three attributes: (1) it must be intended by the court as an unqualified, final disposition of the matter in controversy, (2) unless the court properly acts pursuant to Md. R. Civ. P. 2-602(b), it must adjudicate or complete the adjudication of all claims against all parties, and (3) the clerk must make a proper record of it in accordance with Md. R. Civ. P. 2-601.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore.

Absolute Divorce In Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Counterclaim Maryland Divorce Lawyer Anne Arundel

Counterclaim For A Maryland Divorce – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about a Counterclaim For A Maryland Divorce, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery (Rockville) & Baltimore, Maryland.

Counterclaim For A Maryland Divorce – Maryland Lawyers

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Jackson v. Jackson

Facts:

Appellant husband appealed a decision of the Circuit Court in Baltimore (Maryland) granting appellee wife an absolute divorce from the husband and denying the husband’s counterclaim for dissipation of marital assets. The court of appeals issued a writ of certiorari on its own initiative

If you are facing a criminal case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Counterclaim Maryland Divorce Lawyer Anne Arundel
Counterclaim Maryland Divorce Lawyer Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • Dissipation occurs where one spouse uses marital property for his or her own benefit for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time where the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown. Dissipation may occur on occasions in which (1) the marriage is not undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown; and/or (2) the dissipating spouse’s principal purpose was a purpose other than the purpose of reducing the amount of funds that would be available for equitable distribution at the time of the divorce. Dissipation occurs when marital assets were taken by one spouse without agreement by the other spouse
  • In determining a marital award, a trial court first must determine the amount and value of the marital property. Generally, property disposed of before trial cannot be marital property. An exception to the general rule has been recognized when a court finds that property was intentionally dissipated in order to avoid inclusion of the property towards consideration of a monetary award. Even so, a conveyance made by a husband before and in anticipation of his wife’s suit for alimony, or pending such suit, or after decree has been entered therein in the wife’s favor, to prevent her from obtaining alimony, is fraudulent and may be set aside, unless the grantee took in good faith, without notice and for value. To include property that was disposed of during the marriage, the trial court must be persuaded that there is evidence of dissipation, and the party alleging dissipation has the initial burden of production and burden of persuasion. If the evidence presented in support of a finding of dissipation is insufficient, the trial court reasonably may conclude that the previously relinquished asset should not be included in the marital property.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery (Rockville) & Baltimore, Maryland.

Counterclaim For A Maryland Divorce – Maryland Lawyers

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Federal Child Pornography Laws Maryland Anne Arundel

Federal Child Pornography Laws – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about Federal Child Pornography Laws in Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Federal Child Pornography Laws – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Gerald v. United States

Facts:

Defendant was charged with receiving child pornography and possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2252. The United States District Court for Maryland, denied defendant’s motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment. A jury found defendant guilty on both charges. The district court vacated the possession conviction and sentenced defendant on the receipt offense. Defendant appealed.

If you are facing a Federal case in Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Federal Child Pornography Laws Maryland Anne Arundel
Federal Child Pornography Laws Maryland Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:
  • When the exigencies of the situation make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that a warrantless search or seizure is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, police officers are entitled to bypass the warrant requirement. The types of exigent circumstances that may justify a warrantless seizure include, inter alia, the imminent destruction of evidence. Exigent circumstances can arise when the evidence might be destroyed before a search warrant could be obtained. Even if exigent circumstances have been created by actions of the police — e.g., when the announced presence of officers creates an immediate fear of detection — the authorities are entitled to act reasonably and seize evidence in order to prevent its destruction. In the vast majority of cases in which evidence is destroyed by persons who are engaged in illegal conduct, the reason for the destruction is fear that the evidence will fall into the hands of law enforcement.
  • The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s sister circuits are in agreement that the knowing possession of child pornography is generally a lesser-included offense of the knowing receipt thereof.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Federal Child Pornography Laws – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Child Pornography Penalties Maryland Anne Arundel

Child Pornography Penalties – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about a Child Pornography Charge & the Penalties in Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Child Pornography Charge & the Penalties – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Carl v. State

Facts:

Defendant appealed the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore (Maryland), which convicted defendant of 47 counts of possession of child pornography and two counts of distribution of child pornography and imposed penalties.

If you are facing a criminal case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Child Pornography Penalties Maryland Anne Arundel
Child Pornography Penalties Maryland Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 11-207 makes it illegal to, among other things, knowingly promote, distribute, or possess with the intent to distribute any matter, visual representation, or performance that depicts a minor engaged as a subject of sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct.
  • Several factors exists that may be taken into consideration when deciding whether an abuse of discretion occurred in a trial court’s denial of a motion for a mistrial. But, no single factor is determinative in any case, nor are the factors themselves the test. The factors merely help to evaluate whether the defendant was prejudiced. Some of those factors are: whether the reference to the inadmissible evidence was repeated or whether it was a single, isolated statement; whether the reference was solicited by counsel, or was an inadvertent and unresponsive statement; whether the witness making the reference is the principal witness upon which the entire prosecution depends; the timeliness of the curative instruction; and whether a great deal of other evidence exists. If a curative instruction is given, the instruction must be timely, accurate, and effective.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Child Pornography Charge & the Penalties – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Child Pornography Internet Laws Maryland Anne Arundel

Child Pornography & Internet Laws – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about a Child Pornography Charge & the Internet Laws in Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) and Baltimore, Maryland.

Child Pornography Charge & the Internet Laws – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Dixon v. State

Facts:

Defendant was granted direct review of a judgment of the Circuit Court of Baltimore (Maryland) convicting him of violating Md. Code Ann., Crim. § 11-207(a)(3) (2002 & 2004 Cum. Supp.) after he was found in possession of child pornography images downloaded from the internet on his computer. He argued that the conduct in which he admitted having engaged did not fall under the prohibition of the laws.

If you are facing a criminal case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Child Pornography Internet Laws Maryland Anne Arundel
Child Pornography Internet Laws Maryland Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • For purposes of interpreting child pornography statutes, “depict” is defined as either to form a likeness of by drawing or painting or to represent, portray, or delineate in other ways than in drawing or painting. “Describe” means to represent by words written or spoken for the knowledge or understanding of others. The definitions indicate that the terms denote creative acts. Artists and artisans form a likeness by drawing or painting–they depict. Poets, narrators, and orators represent, portray, or delineate–they depict–and represent by words–they describe. A person who photographs or films pornographic images of a child, who captures such images directly into a computer by means of a digital camera or who first translates a motion picture or photograph of such images into a computer file is engaged in a creative act even though the perverse, heinous, and cruel nature of this creative act differentiates it from the creative acts that society values and tolerates.
  • A violation of Md. Code Ann., Crim. § 11-207(a) (2002 & 2004 Cum. Supp.) is a felony, and, upon conviction, a defendant is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years and a fine for the first offense, and imprisonment not exceeding 20 years and a fine for each subsequent violation. § 11-207(b).

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) and Baltimore, Maryland.

Child Pornography Charge & the Internet Laws – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Different Types Assault Charges Maryland Anne Arundel

Different Types Of Assault Charges – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about the Different Types Of Assault Charges and need a lawyer in Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Baltimore & Montgomery (Rockville) Maryland.

Different Types Of Assault Charges Defense – Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Taylor v. State

Facts:

Defendants were convicted in separate circuit court proceedings of first degree assault pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-202. The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed the convictions. Certiorari was granted and the cases were consolidated.

If you are facing a criminal case in Baltimore, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Different Types Assault Charges Maryland Anne Arundel
Different Types Assault Charges Maryland Anne Arundel

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • By its terms, viewed in the context of the applicable definition of “serious physical injury,” the Maryland first degree assault statute now covers the most serious assaults, including those former aggravated assaults, whose commission ordinarily, although certainly not always, involved the commission of a battery, e.g., assaults with intent to murder, maim and disfigure. Second degree assault, on the other hand, encompasses different types of assaults and batteries, including those former aggravated assaults that ordinarily did not involve completed batteries, e.g., assault with intent to rob, provided that no firearm was used.
  • In Maryland, a person may be convicted of attempted voluntary manslaughter at common law when an individual, engaged in an altercation, suddenly attempts to perpetrate a homicide caused by heat of passion in response to legally adequate provocation, and where the attempt results in something less than the actual wrongful killing. Therefore, attempted voluntary manslaughter requires an attempted homicide in the heat of passion in response to a legally adequate provocation.

We have client meeting locations in Baltimore & Montgomery (Rockville) Maryland.

Different Types Of Assault Charges Defense – Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Penalty Prostitution Anne Arundel County Maryland

Penalty For Prostitution In Anne Arundel County – Maryland Lawyers

If you are concerned about the Penalty For Prostitution In Anne Arundel County, Maryland, contact our law firm immediately for help.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Penalty For Prostitution In Anne Arundel County – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Marker v. State

Facts:

Defendant worked in a massage parlor that was raided by the police. Defendant was accused of offering a sexual act to a police officer. Defendant claimed that she did not know that the premises were being used for prostitution and that the evidence did not support her conviction. The court reversed defendant’s penalty on conviction.

If you are facing a criminal case in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Penalty Prostitution Anne Arundel County Maryland
Penalty Prostitution Anne Arundel County Maryland

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • Md. Ann. Code art. 27, § 15(b) is aimed at two different types of offenders. First, it applies to those who occupy any place for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness or assignation. Secondly, it is directed at those who permit any place owned by him or under his control to be used for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness or assignation with the knowledge or reasonable cause to know that the same is, or is to be used for, such purpose.
  • The phrase “for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness or assignation” under Md. Ann. Code art. 27, § 15(b) is a mens rea requirement modifying the verb “occupy.” “For the purpose of” is one of the phrases used in criminal statutes to indicate some “bad-mind” requirement.
  • “Purpose” is the motive for an act, the intention which prompted it, and without which it would not have occurred. “Purpose” is an intent that motivates. Action is had because of one or more purposes. Accompanying the purpose are intentions which are purely incidental and which exert no influence on the action.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore

Penalty For Prostitution In Anne Arundel County – Maryland Attorneys

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Maryland Criminal Lawyers

Maryland Criminal Lawyers

Shawn v. State

Facts:

The Court of Special Appeals (Maryland) entered a judgment that affirmed petitioner’s criminal convictions, following a jury trial, of first and second degree rape, first and second degree sexual offense, kidnapping, and false imprisonment in Anne Arundel. The state’s highest court granted the petition for writ of certiorari filed by petitioner that asked whether the trial court erred in admitting “other crimes” evidence.

If you are facing a criminal case in Maryland, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore, Maryland

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Maryland Criminal Lawyers
Maryland Criminal Lawyers

Holdings:

The Maryland Court made the following holding:
  • Subject to several exceptions, evidence of other crimes or bad acts is not admissible in Maryland. Propensity evidence, or evidence suggesting that because the defendant is a person of criminal character it is more probable that he committed the crime for which he is on trial, is not admissible into evidence. There are few principles of American criminal jurisprudence more universally accepted than the rule that evidence which tends to show that the accused committed another crime independent of that for which he is on trial, even one of the same type, is inadmissible.
  • Md. R. 5-404 recognizes several exceptions. Evidence of other crimes may be admitted if the evidence is substantially relevant to some contested issue in the case and is not offered to prove guilt based on propensity to commit crimes. The rule makes clear that evidence of a party’s prior bad acts or crimes may be admissible if it possesses some special relevance, i.e. is substantially relevant to some contested issue in the case and is not offered simply to prove criminal character.

We have client meeting locations in Montgomery County (Rockville) & Baltimore, Maryland.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Courts we cover in Anne Arundel, Maryland

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court

P.O. Box 71,
7 Church Circle,
Annapolis, MD 21401

Anne Arundel County District Court

Robert F. Sweeney Building,
251 Rowe Boulevard,
Annapolis, MD 21401.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.